<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>The Cowshed Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:,2008:/378</id>
   <updated>2007-11-29T16:08:54Z</updated>
   <subtitle>Latest thoughts about Huddersfield Town</subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.31</generator>

<entry>
   <title>Would you Adam and Eve it?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk/2007/11/would_you_adam_and_eve_it.html" />
   <id>tag:huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk,2007://378.31824</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-29T16:05:58Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-29T16:08:54Z</updated>
   
   <summary>SO Adam Pearson shows his true colours (not blue and white!), jumping on the trendy &quot;manager sacking&quot; merry-go-round!...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Admin</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="6135" label="Derby" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7202" label="Huddersfield" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7200" label="Pearson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk/">
      SO Adam Pearson shows his true colours (not blue and white!), jumping on the trendy &quot;manager sacking&quot; merry-go-round! 
      It smacks off the new man stamping his authority on a club. 

But was it the right decision  for Derby so early in the season?

 Survival on the last day of the season in the Premiership would be my greatest hope.....if we ever got there ..... and I think a season of away games rather than trips to the Galpharm would be in order. 

So I think the sacking is somewhat premature or was it a personality clash with Billy Davies? 

Maybe he would have done the same with our very own Andy Pandy? 

Only time will tell as to the job he does at Derby but how do Town fans feel having seen what has happened since the failed takeover?

 Personally I have become more and more wary of him as the time passed by. That doesn&apos;t mean Ken Davy is the answer tho!
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Leeds and Leeds and Leeds and Leeds, we all ...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk/2007/11/leeds_and_leeds_and_leeds_and.html" />
   <id>tag:huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk,2007://378.30989</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-21T10:43:21Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-21T10:45:07Z</updated>
   
   <summary>THE decision of the Football League to back Leeds over their ticket allocation to Town absolutely stinks....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Admin</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk/">
      THE decision of the Football League to back Leeds over their ticket allocation to Town absolutely stinks.


      Over 5,000 Town fans went to Elland Road when we played them in the Carling Cup three years ago and, from memory, there was a fantastic atmosphere (even though we lost) and barely a hint of trouble around the ground or in the city.

Leeds are using the excuse that on police advice they can give us only 1,710 tickets because this will help to limit the threat of trouble - but I don&apos;t remember it making any difference when they used to crush us into that old enclosure on the Lowfields:  roughly the same area they are talking about using now. 

If people are intent of causing bother, they will hang around to make sure it happens however many opposition fans are there, and I remember scarpering to avoid troublemaking Leeds fans on more than one occasion.

This is a massive match in the League I calendar and both Leeds and the police should recognise that by offering as many tickets as possible to Town fans. If the minimum allocation is 2,000, we would sell twice that number easily - so why can&apos;t we have the end opposite the Leeds kop?

Maybe Town should seriously think about their own allocation for the Leeds match at the Galpharm later in the season?

Perhaps it&apos;s time to segregate under the Panasonic Stand - surely it wouldn&apos;t cost too much ? - and then Leeds could be given those lower-tier seats in the open air and we could have the &apos;away end&apos; as our own. This would also enable us to create a much better atmosphere for our own team.

It&apos;s time for Town to stop toeing the line on stuff like this. When was the last time the League - or any other club - did us a favour?
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The Price is right with your host Steve Bruce</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk/2007/11/the_price_is_right_with_your_h.html" />
   <id>tag:huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk,2007://378.30811</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-19T14:55:33Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-19T14:59:23Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Why oh why did we not hang on to Steve Bruce till Wigan handed us a load of cash for a manager we wanted rid of? Birmingham must be laughing all the way to the bank no compensation to pay,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Admin</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk/">
      Why oh why did we not hang on to Steve Bruce till Wigan handed us a load of cash for a manager we wanted rid of? Birmingham must be laughing all the way 
to the bank no compensation to pay, get rid of the manager and get wads of cash, several Christmas&apos;s all at once in the second city.


      Mark &apos;Huddy&apos; Hudson scored a cracker - and the winner - for Rotherham at Accrington Stanley.  Most fans will  remember him as one of the worst finishers ever to wear the blue and white stripes. So how does that work?
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Robbie live at The Galpharm!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk/2007/11/robbie_live_at_the_galpharm.html" />
   <id>tag:huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk,2007://378.30810</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-19T14:53:33Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-19T14:55:30Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Robbie Williams plays live at Galpharm The long awaited arrival of Robbie Williams has at last happened - although I must say the picture of him on last weekends Examiner back page did not fill me full of hope, he...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Admin</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="6928" label="Huddersfield Town" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6930" label="nathan Clarke" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk/">
      Robbie Williams plays live at Galpharm


The long awaited arrival of Robbie Williams has at last happened - although I must say the picture of him on last weekends Examiner back page
did not fill me full of hope, he looked more like something off a phones 4 U advert  &apos;there she blows&apos; (if you have not seen the advert it will be a bit lost on you)
he also must have been spending too much time with Nathan (what do we do when the other side are attacking - put your hands in the air) Clarke 
Robbie had BOTH hands in the air (Nathan&apos;s a bit more casual he just has the one arm in the air all the time) which makes me think he may be a bit more confident than Nathan
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Worthy Comeback?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk/2007/11/worthy_comeback.html" />
   <id>tag:huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk,2007://378.30496</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-15T14:24:14Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-15T14:28:31Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Week 14 of the Town recovery programme Just heard the &quot;great news&quot; that Jon (The Captain) Worthington is on the road to recovery. Why is this great news lets face it Tin Tin sorry Jon has had is day. The...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>liam</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="6822" label="Jon Worthington" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk/">
      Week 14 of the Town recovery programme

Just heard the &quot;great news&quot; that Jon (The Captain) Worthington is on the road to recovery. 
Why is this great news lets face it Tin Tin sorry Jon has had is day.

The only captaincy he should come anywhere near is Captain Haddock (sorry another Tin Tin reference).

      We await his return to the team with baited breath like the return of Michael Owen (remember same surgeon).

In Mr Owen&apos;s case good link-up play always a danger in the box.

But what can we expect from our returning hero - mistimed tackles, bookings, sendings off, passes that pick out the opposition and of course bursts into the opposing penalty area to smash the ball high and wide.

A bit harsh on Tin Tin you may say but we can only go by the form book.

With Rear Admiral Ken still in charge of the fleet after repelling the infamous football club pirate 
Adam (blue and white beard) Pearson,  we appear to sailing into calmer waters which means 
a few more months drifting in the doldrums
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>What&apos;s the crack with the backroom staff at the Galpharm?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk/2007/11/whats_the_crack_with_the_backr.html" />
   <id>tag:huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk,2007://378.30498</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-14T14:30:12Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-15T14:32:40Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Very rarely does a new manager keep the existing staff at the club once a manager has been sacked. But oh not Andy Ritchie at Town. We reckon Dungworth and Booty must be complete YES men (just like Phil Neal...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>liam</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="6824" label="Andy Ritchie" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6826" label="Peter Jackson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://huddersfield-town.examiner.co.uk/">
      Very rarely does a new manager keep the existing staff at the club once a manager has been sacked. But oh not Andy Ritchie at Town. 

We reckon Dungworth and Booty must be complete YES men (just like Phil Neal was to Graham Taylor).

      Ritchie claims to have a different style of play to the greasy haired one and yet they must have believed in Jackos style of football. 

Do their personalities fit together just perfectly OR has Ritchie been told that he has to stick with them cos they are in the cheap and cheerful pay bracket.

If they were that good why didn&apos;t Jacko come back for them when he got the Lincoln job!! 
There are so many things wrong with our football club at the moment, its hard to know where to start. 

Theres 8 or 9 of us that normlly go to the games...there were 2 against Port Vale on Tuesday night!!
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
